|
|
Post by chris burgess on Nov 3, 2005 8:54:48 GMT
Eh?  |
|
|
|
Post by danreynolds on Nov 3, 2005 10:13:28 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Northy on Nov 3, 2005 13:30:36 GMT
Nope, I think its the other wy round!  Somebody shoot me and put me out of my missery....  |
|
|
|
Post by chris burgess on Nov 3, 2005 14:59:40 GMT
Nope, I think its the other wy round! Somebody shoot me and put me out of my missery.... I think you are wrong Graham.....surely if the roll bar is longer between it's captive points, it has more room to fles, and is therefore "softer"....less room to flex must mean it's "harder"... |
|
|
|
Post by Cooper on Nov 3, 2005 15:21:37 GMT
this topic is hilarious  |
|
|
|
Post by Northy on Nov 3, 2005 16:54:55 GMT
BUT if the roll bar is longer there is more leverage on the bar.
If the roll bar flexes it's crap and won't work consistantly.
G
|
|
|
|
Post by chris burgess on Nov 3, 2005 17:32:30 GMT
Ok, maybe flex was the wrong word, but I still stand by what I said.....further distance between the two fixings means a softer roll bar...
|
|
|
|
Post by chris burgess on Nov 3, 2005 17:32:54 GMT
this topic is hilarious thanks for your input coops!  |
|
|
|
Post by Cooper on Nov 3, 2005 18:17:24 GMT
this topic is hilarious thanks for your input coops! Ok Ok i'll ask an expert ( users.pandora.be/elvo) !!! expert says: picture is correct because: in the situaton more on the inside(hard), the lenght you bend is less than the other hole(soft). small lenght = harder and vice versa |
|
|
|
Post by Northy on Nov 3, 2005 18:53:09 GMT
Tim, is that what Richard said?
G
|
|
|
|
Post by Cooper on Nov 3, 2005 18:59:34 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Northy on Nov 6, 2005 17:34:25 GMT
I've taken the bloody thing off now anyway! ;D
|
|
